Mikey P
Administrator
I have some questions about your wand..
Does this wand get used dailey?
By who?
Do you have any idea how the manifold on the left was bent/shifted out of place? (that wand,m the PCQJ, has the sturdiest manifold mounting design in the industry so I'm curious to what it took to tweak it.)
Does the "Charlie Brown" Interlink glide, leave lines between the slots/ zig-zags where water/soil is not being extracted?

Here is a photo of a new glide, looking at the end design I would have to assume that edge cleaning/extracting is almost no existent, can you confirm this?
I find that the 16 time's easier to use benefits of Teflon over Acetal plastic claim to be a bold and yet silly statement. Have you used both types of glides and would you care to make comments on your observations?
Does this wand get used dailey?
By who?
Do you have any idea how the manifold on the left was bent/shifted out of place? (that wand,m the PCQJ, has the sturdiest manifold mounting design in the industry so I'm curious to what it took to tweak it.)
Does the "Charlie Brown" Interlink glide, leave lines between the slots/ zig-zags where water/soil is not being extracted?

Here is a photo of a new glide, looking at the end design I would have to assume that edge cleaning/extracting is almost no existent, can you confirm this?
I find that the 16 time's easier to use benefits of Teflon over Acetal plastic claim to be a bold and yet silly statement. Have you used both types of glides and would you care to make comments on your observations?
Last edited: